Mobilizing the Region

Issue 227 July 2, 1999



NY Agencies Prepare Future Progress


New York transportation agencies approved Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP) -- federally required capital plan documents -- for New York City and Long Island this week. The Campaign's full comments on the documents are available at www.tstc.org. Generally, they criticize balkanized regional planning -- under the NY Metropolitan Transportation Council, the existence of three separate "coordinating committees" limits discussion and planning between NYC, Long Island and the Hudson Valley. We also call for the State DOT to reconsider its Long Island highway widening ambitions, and for a variety of rail freight, transit and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements in NYC.

- NYS DOT: Big Plans for Staten Island Highways -
In the NYC TIP, NY State DOT envisions moving its Staten Island Expressway project into the environmental impact statement (EIS) stage in mid-2000. The EIS will presumably build on the SIE major investment study still going on. However, while the investment study looked only at the SIE, the EIS will cover the West Shore Expressway as well. The West Shore inclusion in the EIS strongly suggests DOT is looking primarily at a major highway expansion rather than at the various transit and travel demand management options that were included in the major investment analysis.

Overall, the SIE major investment study has failed to look at whether roadway pricing policies could limit congestion in the corridor. Although major investment study guidelines call for investigation of economic incentives, DOT's analyses have been limited to High Occupancy/Toll Lanes that would implemented by adding a lane in each direction.

While new tolled lanes may hold increased vehicle volumes and induced car and truck trips somewhat below those that a new general lane would generate, DOT's preliminary assessments of HO/T lanes unsurprisingly show a greater increase in SIE traffic volume than any other alternative. Introducing a "third toll" between the Goethals and Verrazano Bridges, even if confined to new lanes, will also be extraordinarily problematic in Staten Island.

A standard HOV lane proposal is probably more likely. Environmental and other groups will still challenge such a project as a facilitator of greater traffic, and are ready to declare the major investment study incomplete if it doesn't examine the obvious toll policy options available for a roadway that lies between two toll bridges. An SIE carpool lane could also be susceptible to the type of campaign that swept HOV lane rules away on I-287 and I-80 in NJ last year.



Calendar of EventsLast ArticleTable of ContentsNext ArticleBack to Main Page