Mobilizing the Region
Issue 244November 5, 1999



Washington Worthies


Last week, Senator Frank Lautenberg introduced a new "High Speed Rail and Investment Act." It would authorize Amtrak to sell $10 billion in rail bonds over the next ten years to build high speed rail corridors in various parts of the U.S. Rail upgrades in busy corridors like San Diego-Los Angeles, Milwaukee-Chicago and between Florida cities have been proposed in various forms for years. Lautenberg appeared to also offer the possibility of further improving speeds in the Northeast Corridor, where Amtrak is set to launch high-speed service next year.

Lautenberg praised high speed rail as "a smart investment" and said his legislation would represent a large step towards giving passenger rail the same kind of public support offered for decades to highways and air travel, and could ease both road and runway congestion. The bill is expected to be submitted to the Environment and Public Works Committee before Congress recesses next week. Senate co-sponsors are NY’s Moynihan, Jim Jeffords of Vermont, and Joseph Biden of Delaware. Pro-rail activists are presently rounding up midwestern co-sponsors.

This week, the EPA convened a hearing on a new rule that will finally crack down on pollution from heavy vehicles. The rule would reduce the amount of sulfur allowed in diesel fuel and close a loophole that exempts SUV’s from a wide ranging of air emission regulations. Because sulfur creates large particles when burned, any reduction will mean cleaner air. More importantly, the sulfur contaminates the catalysts used to clean emissions before they are released into the air. Over time this can severely limit the cleaning capacity of installed converters. Scientists estimate that 90% of the nation's trucks and buses belch out excess pollutants due to this effect. So for New Yorkers living along Canal Street or the Cross-Bronx Expressway, this rule should offer some respite when its requirements come into effect over the next five to ten years.

Clean air advocates still want the rule tightened. They say emission standards should be stricter and go into effect sooner, and want trucks to be subject to emissions tests throughout their lifetimes. Another failing of the rule is that it does not extend pollution standards to off-road vehicles like construction equipment that, per vehicle, pollute 15 times more than comparable on-road counterparts.



Calendar of EventsLast ArticleTable of ContentsNext ArticleBack to Main Page