
| Issue 307 | March 5, 2001 |
| Transportation Alternatives' Winter, 2001 magazine reports that Downtown
Brooklyn pilot traffic calming projects are finally being implemented.
But the organization warns that the projects' designs have been so diluted
that
community groups wonder whether they will have any impact on car speeds
or through-traffic volumes.
Traffic calming in NYC has suffered from conflicting impulses among city transportation managers. The need to better protect pedestrians and neighborhood character from burgeoning traffic is obvious, yet a strong "car party" within the transportation bureaucracy seems clearly uncomfortable with the reversal of traditional traffic engineering that traffic calming represents. Thus, promising speed hump deployment has slowed down, and was criticized by former city Transportation Commissioner Wilbur Chapman (MTR #245). The NYC DOT's Downtown Brooklyn traffic calming project has ridden the same waves, and has been a subject of controversy for years. Brooklyn civic leaders, elected officials and pedestrian advocates had to fight hard to keep the city from scuttling the project altogether (see MTR #114), and as recently as last summer, DOT officials said they hoped any traffic calming measures would affect traffic as little as possible (MTR #269). |
|
T.A. says the projects the city is promoting in Brooklyn represent only
the mildest traffic calming measures. For instance, raised crosswalk
and intersection applications are only two inches high, as opposed to the
international standard of four inches. DOT has also refused to install
sidewalk-extending "neckdowns" at many of the intersections where they
would be most effective. The Department also shies away from bollards at
streetcorners, arguing that they could create problems for "speeding
motorists."
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |