Tri-State Transportation Campaign
Mobilizing the Region  

MTR #524

Download PDF »

Get Adobe Reader


Previous editions:
MTR #523
MTR #522
MTR #521
MTR #520

Mobilizing the Region #524

March 17, 2006

Inside this edition:

Mega-Project as Trans-Hudson Poker Chip
The NY Sun reported a week ago that the project to construct a new commuter rail tunnel from Secaucus to Midtown Manhattan had become a bargaining chip in the tug-of-war over the World Trade Center site rebuilding plan.

Groups Vow to Defeat Legislation at Polls as Trenton Strips Fix-It Measure
The NJ Environmental Federation, Sierra Club NJ Chapter and the Tri-State Transportation Campaign said they would fight the constitutional dedication of 1.5 cents of the state gas tax to the Transportation Trust Fund, as proposed by Governor Corzine to underwrite a huge new transportation debt program, because language directing the NJ DOT to spend most of its construction resources to maintain and improve existing infrastructure was stripped out of transportation funding bills by lawmakers this week, apparently at the behest of construction unions.

Jersey Still Has Nation's Poorest Roads
The state legislature undermined New Jersey's "fix-it-first" law at a time when the Garden State holds the distinction of having the greatest share of roads in "poor" condition in the United States.

City and Big Developers: Getting to Win-Win
In an essay in a recent Regional Plan Association Spotlight on the Region, RPA's Jeremy Soffin attributed a New York City "inferiority complex" toward developers to a generation of "urban ailments.".

Passive Bus Lane ≠ Bus Rapid Transit
The NY State DOT is still not studying the smart bus rapid transit system across the Tappan Zee bridge corridor requested by transit advocates.

More Than Small Fixes Needed on S.I.
Proposals to ease Staten Island traffic are due next week, according to Mayor Bloomberg's January charge to city agencies to quickly produce a traffic relief plan.

Community Eyes Benefits of De-Paving
A community visioning process conducted by the Southern Bronx River Watershed Alliance is developing ideas for how to use land freed up if the Sheridan Expressway is demapped and removed.

More Riders on the (Light) Rails
New stations in Union City and North Bergen are feeding thousands of new riders onto the Hudson-Bergen light rail line.

100's of Hybrids Coming to a Lane Near You?
The NY State Department of Motor Vehicles told MTR that 640 vehicle owners have signed up since the new "CleanPass" program to allow 45 MPG or better hybrid-fueled cars to use the Long Island Expressway HOV lane was begun March 1st.

Kill Your Speed, Not Staten Island
Transportation Alternatives launched an anti-speeding campaign on Staten Island at the end of February, in a public-education response to growing numbers of law-breaking related crashes and pedestrian deaths in the borough.

Good Ideas Dept.
Two Assembly bills - supporting bus lane enforcement cameras and a pilot truck-weight monitoring system - have recently been introduced in Albany.

To Clarify
We'd like to clarify statements in MTR issues 520 and 523.


Mega-Project as Trans-Hudson Poker Chip

The NY Sun reported a week ago that the project to construct a new commuter rail tunnel from Secaucus to Midtown Manhattan had become a bargaining chip in the tug-of-war over the World Trade Center site rebuilding plan.

The reasoning was that New York would be more amenable to supporting the rail tunnel if New Jersey officials within the Port Authority closed ranks with the Pataki Administration in confronting World Trade Center lease-holder Larry Silverstein.

In any event, the downtown talks seem stalled, while New York transportation agencies gave a collective thumbs-up to the rail tunnel project at a meeting of the NY Metropolitan Transportation Council this week.

That’s good, because there are better reasons for New York to support the commuter rail project, and possibly a better deal for it to strike regarding significant Port Authority funding.

Port Authority Chair Anthony Coscia, an appointee of former NJ Governor James McGreevey, has mentioned the possibility of the PA contributing in the neighborhood of $2 billion to the tunnel, called the Trans-Hudson Express Tunnel by NJ Transit. The quid pro quo with New York so far has been Governor Pataki’s insistence on Port Authority involvement in the ill-conceived LIRR connection to lower Manhattan.

Hopefully, that idea will die out under the next administration. New York needs a big infusion of funds for the big transit projects — Long Island Rail Road to Grand Central and the Second Avenue Subway — that it is about to begin. Port Authority funding to help realize them along with the Trans-Hudson Express could just be the grand deal the region’s transit system needs.

The inherent reasons why New York should support the Hudson tunnel have to do with development and regional dynamics. New Jersey is growing faster than Long Island, and no capacity is left in existing transit connections between New Jersey and New York City. Meanwhile, ambitions for developing Midtown’s west side are increasingly pivoting around the idea of a revitalized Penn Station transit complex, and new rail capacity from the west can only further those visions.

The Trans-Hudson tunnel became a chip of another sort further up-river last week as well, when environmental group Riverkeeper said the project made the idea of transit service across the Tappan Zee Bridge unnecessary (west-of-Hudson commuter rail lines may achieve a one-seat ride to Penn Station in the Trans-Hudson Express plan). The position ignores the fact that most of the traffic congestion on the bridge is generated by east-west travel, not people driving to Manhattan, but it is true that Metro-North’s ambition to build Rockland-to-Grand Central commuter rail will have to account for the market share absorbed by direct Rockland-Penn Station service.

[Back to Top]


Groups Vow to Defeat Legislation at Polls as Trenton Strips Fix-It Measure

The NJ Environmental Federation, Sierra Club NJ Chapter and the Tri-State Transportation Campaign said they would fight the constitutional dedication of 1.5 cents of the state gas tax to the Transportation Trust Fund, as proposed by Governor Corzine to underwrite a huge new transportation debt program (MTR #’s 521, 522), because language directing the NJ DOT to spend most of its construction resources to maintain and improve existing infrastructure (MTR #523) was stripped out of transportation funding bills by lawmakers this week, apparently at the behest of construction unions.

Constitutional dedication of NJ tax revenues must be approved by voters. The Trust Fund measure would appear on this November’s ballot. Its defeat could force reconsideration of the giant borrowing scheme, since the 1.5 cents currently collected as general revenue is one of only a handful of sources of real money that Corzine’s plan directs to transportation. Additional organizations were joining the pledge to fight the dedication as this edition was being finished.

[Back to Top]


Jersey Still Has Nation's Poorest Roads

The state legislature undermined New Jersey’s “fix-it-first” law at a time when the Garden State holds the distinction of having the greatest share of roads in “poor” condition in the United States.

The Federal Highway Administration rates pavement conditions nationwide using the “International Roughness Index,” whose scale ranges across ratings of Poor, Mediocre, Fair, Good and Very Good.

As of 2004, New Jersey had the greatest percentage of roads in any state in “poor” condition, the lowest federal ranking, at 15%. This share has increased steadily from 12% in 1999. About 80% of NJ roads are in less than “good” condition (third worst in the U.S.), another measure that has worsened in recent years. Over one-third of the state’s bridges are obsolete or structurally deficient, according to the FHWA (9th worst).

[Back to Top]


City and Big Developers: Getting to Win-Win

In an essay in a recent Regional Plan Association Spotlight on the Region, RPA’s Jeremy Soffin attributed a New York City “inferiority complex” toward developers to a generation of “urban ailments.” That perspective causes city leaders to “roll out the red carpet for any development project willing to look twice at our once proud city.”

That doesn’t need to be the case now that the city has regained its pride and is again the place to be. Soffin notes that despite the debate unfolding around city subsidies for a red-hot housing market, the city still asks almost nothing of those proposing huge development complexes in the city’s midst.

He describes the giant parking proposal, absence of transit improvements and destruction of parks in the new Yankee stadium plan well-known to MTR readers as one example — “The underlying theme is that the City…seems to believe the only way to get these projects built is to work as a junior partner of the developer” — and concludes that “it’s time the City’s policies reflect our newfound self-respect.”

An interesting perspective on the RPA piece comes this week in Nassau County Executive Thomas Suozzi’s announcement of the redevelopment plan for the Nassau Coliseum area. Leaving aside the plan’s alienating “towers-in-parks” quality, the Wang-Reckson development plan will contribute $55 million to transportation improvements in the area, including new bus services and improvements to the pedestrian environment. Something on this order could surely have been extracted from recent approvals for projects like the IKEA in Brooklyn, along with appropriately-scaled transportation measures for the other big boxes proliferating around the city outside of Manhattan.

(Suozzi claims “no cost to the taxpayer” as a result of the deal, though older information distributed by Wang’s Lighthouse group suggests substantial NY State funding of the Coliseum renovation.) See www.rpa.org/spotlight/news_temp.html.

[Back to Top]


Passive Bus Lane ≠ Bus Rapid Transit

The NY State DOT is still not studying the smart bus rapid transit system across the Tappan Zee bridge corridor requested by transit advocates.

In a recent forum on the bridges plans, hosted by Federated Conservationists of Westchester County, DOT’s project directors said buses run by a variety of operators would use a busway along the corridor, but offered no assurance that the agency was studying service plans that would create efficient corridor transit service. Spokespeople for the many agencies now involved have said conflicting things about whether a service plan in which buses travel both on and off a dedicated busway to reach worksites along the I-287 is under study.

A potential advantage of bus rapid transit (BRT) over the Tappan Zee is its flexibility in low density settings. Rapid buses could collect passengers at stops in bedroom communities, bypass congestion in a dedicated right-of-way along I-287, and then branch off on different routes to serve job sites along I-287. This could give the largest number of riders in the east-west Tappan Zee travel market one-seat rides, reduce the need for shuttle buses and increase transit revenue.

So far, DOT is not studying service with an intelligent, locally-tailored operating plan designed to attract riders — a hallmark of bus rapid transit systems around the world — apparently opting for the passive approach of laying out a lane and seeing who comes to use it. If true, the agencies conducting the study should throw bus rapid transit out of the mix now and stop pretending to consider it. If they do care about really testing BRT, then they need to hire someone who knows what they are talking about.

Also at the forum, project managers hinted that because of high construction costs, the project may have to be built “in phases.” Transit advocates worry that this means the highway bridge will be built while transit components languish due to funding problems. Expect vociferous challenges to any plan featuring such “phasing."

[Back to Top]


More Than Small Fixes Needed on S.I.

Proposals to ease Staten Island traffic are due next week, according to Mayor Bloomberg’s January charge to city agencies to quickly produce a traffic relief plan (MTR #519). Members of a Staten Island Task force have hawked wish lists to city Transportation and Planning departments. But a Staten Island Advance report on likely proposals asks whether the finished plan will do much to ease traffic.

The task force is led by city transportation commissioner Iris Weinshall and planning commissioner Amanda Burden.

Some of the hundreds of suggestions urged by task force members, reported in the Advance, are:

  • More turning lanes on Island streets;
  • Cracking down on speeders;
  • Running Hudson-Bergen light rail over the Bayonne Bridge;
  • Banning left turns on parts of Hylan Boulevard;
  • Reserving Hylan's curb lanes for buses;
  • Requiring developers to improve roads;
  • Opening a road through the Fresh Kills landfill;
  • Widening streets;
  • Build a third MTA bus depot;
  • Establish South Shore fast ferry service.

Some of these suggestions are worthy of consideration and may displace a few local auto trips or address particular bottlenecks. Many have been bandied for years. So far, it seems that the Task Force has not strongly intersected with the effort by Staten Island elected officials to let cars use the new S.I. Expressway bus lanes.

Probably the most important thing that can come from the effort is a commitment to keep working to produce a more comprehensive transportation plan for the long term. Such a plan will be a challenge, because it will require making some tradeoffs between moving transit vehicles, such as rapid buses, and keeping cars happy. If done well, it would also identify areas for denser development instead of allowing traffic-causing sprawl to continue along the West Shore Expressway.

[Back to Top]


Community Eyes Benefits of De-Paving

A community visioning process conducted by the Southern Bronx River Watershed Alliance is developing ideas for how to use land freed up if the Sheridan Expressway is demapped and removed.

Demapping is one alternative under study in the NY State Dept. of Transportation’s Bruckner-Sheridan Interchange project.

The advocacy groups that make up the alliance, such as Sustainable South Bronx and the Pratt Center, have long urged that the little-used and redundant Sheridan be removed in favor of better Bronx River-front uses. The visioning process will help make the idea more concrete for the surrounding communities and their elected representatives.

A recent session on the Sheridan land’s physical features concluded that public access to the waterfront is preferable to development directly on the river’s edge, and sought to identify better pedestrian connections through the Sheridan area to surrounding neighborhoods as well as over the barrier represented by the Amtrak right-of-way. Participants also discussed the opportunity for a new Metro-North Railroad station at Hunts Point Avenue. www.southbronxvision.org.

[Back to Top]


More Riders on the (Light) Rails

New stations in Union City and North Bergen are feeding thousands of new riders onto the Hudson-Bergen light rail line. NJ Transit opened Bergenline and Tonnelle Avenue stations February 25, rapidly boosting daily ridership on the system from 23,378 to 27,222. Transit’s target is 34,000 daily riders in 2007.

NJ Transit’s Camden-Trenton River Line also continues to exceed early ridership expectations, with over 1,000 more average daily riders in February 2006 over February of 2005, when the daily average was close to 7,000.

[Back to Top]


100's of Hybrids Coming to a Lane Near You?

The NY State Department of Motor Vehicles told MTR that 640 vehicle owners have signed up since the new “CleanPass” program to allow 45 MPG or better hybrid-fueled cars to use the Long Island Expressway HOV lane was begun March 1st.

New York State DOT reports that the program is actually a one year pilot program that will be revisited for its congestion impacts. This had previously been unreported, and dovetails favorably with a similar review element inserted in similar programs in California. DOT officials promised they will repeal the program if the HOV lane becomes too crowded, and they are strictly monitoring the program’s effects.

Federal transportation law allows hybrid cars without the requisite number of occupants to use HOV lane and bypass HOV restrictions, but only if the hybrids don’t degrade speeds in HOV lanes.

But in places like Virginia, hybrid-admission rules have allowed hybrids (even hybrid SUVs that barely get more than 30 miles per gallon) to overcrowd HOV lanes, political pressure has slowed repeal of the measure, a lesson for New York officials should consider.

[Back to Top]


Kill Your Speed, Not Staten Island

Transportation Alternatives launched an anti-speeding campaign on Staten Island at the end of February, in a public-education response to growing numbers of law-breaking related crashes and pedestrian deaths in the borough.

The campaign’s motto, “Speeding – There’s No Excuse,” targets motorists’ rationalizations for reckless behavior: A campaign poster at a Staten Island bus stop along a busy roadway says “Died to Cash a Check” – a pointed reminder to passing motorists to slow down.

Funding for the effort was established by City Council members Michael McMahon and James Oddo. The Advance recently reported that Staten Island police issued 10,235 speeding summonses in 2005, and also noted that S.I. University Hospital has seen more pedestrian victims, including eight fatalities last year.

[Back to Top]


Good Ideas Dept.

Assemblyman Pete Grannis, representing Manhattan’s Upper East Side, has re-submitted his legislative proposal to create a bus lane enforcement camera demonstration project. Grannis’ bill, A1832, contends that “motorists illegally parking in bus stops and occupying designated bus lanes create significant safety dangers for bus passengers boarding and disembarking buses.”

Bus lane enforcement cameras would discourage motorists from abusing bus lanes and help reverse the sloppy attitude toward special lanes that runs through New York’s motoring public, police and city government.

Bus lane enforcement cameras have shown good results in London, helping to keep buses on schedule. A1832 went to the Assembly’s Transportation Committee in January but has not yet been reviewed; it also lacks a Senate counterpart. The Legislature has been very weak on proposals to make traffic law enforcement more efficient, however. Assembly Transportation Chair David Gantt of Rochester has routinely opposed increasing the use of life-saving red light cameras in New York City, for instance (MTR # 370), though some report he is doing Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver’s bidding in the matter.

Brooklyn Assemblyman Joe Lentol has also introduced legislation (A02435) which would allow implementation of a pilot truck-weight monitoring system. Sensor technology able to detect overweight trucks would trigger cameras that generate a summons to the truck owner. The long-evolving NYC DOT truck route management study doesn’t address weight violations, which increase infrastructure damage, so the bill is an important contribution to the overall discussion of truck impacts in the city.

[Back to Top]


To Clarify

In MTR # 520, we reported that the Bee-Line bus system will see a 50% rise in state operating assistance, from $28 million to over $42 million. Governor Pataki’s budget does call for Westchester to receive $42 million this year, but it received $35.6 million last year, not $28 million, making a 19% increase over last year.

In MTR #523, we stated that Metropool offers the federal pre-tax transit benefit. Metropool in fact offers info on carpooling, vanpooling, bicycling, walking, and telecommuting, but not TransitChek.

[Back to Top]

 

Search the TSTC Site

Powered by Google.

Each week, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign publishes Mobilizing the Region, a free bulletin of New Jersey, Connecticut and New York region transportation news and opinion.

Sign Up for Free Weekly Updates »
 
MTR Archived Issues
 
The Commuter Zone

New York
New Jersey
Connecticut


 

© 2005 Tri-State Transportation Campaign
350 West 31st Street #802, New York NY 10001
212.268.7474